Media credit to Beverly Congdon. King Middle School in Portland, Maine gives birth control to students.
Mommy, look what I got at school today!
Tracy Harriger | 10/29/07 | Opinion

It shall come as no surprise to anyone living in the twenty-first century that the United States is said to have “regressed” in the promotion of moral values since even the early 1900s. No, I’m not saying that our society in general has failed to instill a least a teeny bit of ethical value within this present generation of teenagers. But it has to be admitted that moral values are definitely beginning to become a second priority in comparison to academics, athletics, and social life in general. Such an example of this comes to us from King Middle School in Portland, Maine, where the school board has approved that contraceptives be handed out to all students who wish to have them. No parent permission is required.

After hearing these facts, my jaw was compelled to drop to the ground and I was forced to stare at my computer screen in total shock. How on earth can a junior high – a school filled with 11, 12, and 13 year olds – be advocating sexual relationships?

For an educational facility to become a proponent to what many families consider to be an immoral activity before marriage is highly unethical and not appropriate for a student of any age, and especially not a pupil as young as 11-years-old. It is also incredibly insulting for a school to somehow unofficially take over the job of the parent to dictate whether premarital sex is acceptable or not.

The United States being statistically defined as a predominantly Protestant and Catholic nation would appear to define a sexual relationship as one that occurs between a husband and wife (and that meaning after the wedding ceremony, NOT before). But these imaginary numbers belie the actual sentiments that are being lived out everyday by the American people. No numerical value is needed to prove that more and more pregnancies, particularly those of teenagers, are occurring outside of marriage.

It is for this reason stated above that the Maine junior high school decided to offer their students protection, just in case they should find themselves in EXTREMELY close quarters with an individual of the opposite sex.Though the school administration may have good intentions behind their actions, their decision was exceedingly faulty. By making contraceptives available to students, the idea of “waiting” is suddenly labeled as taboo. It appears that not even the older generation of parents and teachers sees premarital sex as wrong, or even in bad taste. Almost unknowingly, this panel of respected elders has given the OK for many students to defy their parent’s wishes of abstinence. And obviously, disobedience of a child toward his or her parents is not something that is greatly respected in society.

The media plays a large enough role in influencing today’s teenage generation to disregard former traditions of sexual purity. And for a school to become an advocate of such activities only further influences the youth of ourworld to think that once immoral pursuits are now ethically acceptable.

It is completely improper for educators to play mommy and daddy to their class. Though it is the job of teachers to have a positive influence on their pupils, they are not mandated to set standards of propriety for students outside of the class. It is the job of the parent and not the instructor to establish rules and regulations for children.

“But kids will have sex anyway,” many may say. “Teenagers never obey their parent’s rules.”

Perhaps it is naïve of me, but I refuse to believe that all teenagers are rebellious beings concentrating on resisting all moral traditions. If it is not advocated or even proposed in the first place, teens are not going to become involved in sexual activity before marriage. It is not something that our grandparents or even our parents were taught was socially acceptable.

When we fail to ground ourselves in ethics our entire foundation for living starts slipping away. Moral values do not bind us, they tie us to a base that allows us to live doing what is right.

Read the opposing side of this story!



Please keep in mind that this is a high school newspaper. Please make your responses professional and appropriate. Any comments deemed inappropriate will not be posted.
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:

Grizzly Weather
Gazette Podcast
NSPA
Name: Jessica K.
Date & Time: Thursday, January 31, 2008 02:09 pm
Subject: Mommy, look what I got at school today!
I have to agree with Tracy. It should not be the school board's responsibility to attempt to stop teenage pregnancy. It is already bad enough that girls can go to the doctors and say "I want an abortion" without their parents' consent. I believe that if a girl or boy can't sit down with their parents and say "I want to have sex with my boyfriend/girlfriend," then mentally they are not ready to engage in sexual intercourse. Yes, it is awkward but you have to realize it is not the parents' fault. Living here in the Valley and living in such a small town, I can't even begin to count the many girls and boys telling their parents "Is it alright if I stay over at my friends house?" and then have them sneak off to a house party. But parenting skills is the exact opposite of what Tracy is saying. In several cases the young girls that become pregnant say "My parents never let me have a boyfriend or let me see him. That's why I did it." The parents need to remember, the more restrictions you put on your child, the more they will rebel. I mean, just think of it. Did your parents ever ground you from the phone, but you waited till you fell asleep and called your friend? Same concept applies to having sex. Overbearing parents drive adolescents crazy and they rebel. If you don't believe me, do a school wide survey that says "If your parents were to ground you from seeing your boyfriend/girlfriend, would you lie to your parents and say that you're going to a friend's house and in reality you're going to see your boyfriend." See what your results are. Now I'm not saying that kids should be free spirits. All I am saying is that parents should talk to their kids and have an open relationship and not go overboard on the rules.
Name: Morgen
Date & Time: Friday, January 18, 2008 02:51 pm
Subject: Mommy, Look What I got at School Today!

I would personally have to agree with Tracy! Our society today, for the younger generation of kids, is getting worse when it comes to sexual manners. I was shocked when I read that not a high school, but a junior high school, was handing out condoms. It's unbelievable. I agree with saving yourself until marriage, and saving that special moment for someone special! It's sad to see what many little kids and teenagers are doing! Hopefully they can realize that they're still 'babies' themselves, so why risk having one?

Name: Krystal F.
Date & Time: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:17 pm
Subject: Mommy, Look What I got at School Today!
I really cannot decide my opinion on this because it's faulty on both points. However, I must weigh the results of each side and see which I prefer. Personally, I agree that contraceptives should be handed out if needed for the main fact that as I look around the class I am presently in, I see very few who don't practice the act openly. Yes, I understand if contraceptives are handed out some kids automatically think "OK, I got what I need so nothing bad can happen." Then they go out and carry out the act. But not handing them out will help, if only slightly. In fact, there really isn't anything we can do to stop this epidemic of pregnancies because in fact teens now do what they want and sadly enough are sometimes to0 lazy to use contraceptives because they are "messy" or "hard to remember." I say wait until you're married. But if you can't, please use protection!
Name: Jesus
Date & Time: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:57 pm
Subject: Mommy, Look What I got at School Today!
I would have to agree with Tracy on this point. A week ago we had an Ed segment in an organization at school on sex education. We were asked if our parents ever gave us the "sex talk". Guess what. The majority said no. It was either a completely untouched issue at home or vaguely and quickly implied. These are eleven-year-old children you're handing contraceptives. I don’t know about the rest of you, but to me, that [is] trying to hide the issue of teenage pregnancy. You believe that handing 11-year-old children contraceptives makes everything magically disappear. That by TRYING to prevent it falls under good parenting, the best solution to the issue. Another thing we all had in common [was] our answer to the question [about whether we had] learned about sex in the classroom during sex education in school. Now if what I experienced that day is true for most of the children, we've got a problem. By giving [out] those contraceptives you are basically stating that having sex is okay as long as there is “protection." Instead of handing out “protection” you should educate these children. Do your job as a parent. Do your job as a school and teach these children. Yes, it is a fact that teenage pregnancy is happening and it will continue to happen. That is because you allow it to happen. If you don’t believe me look at King Middle School, look at what they gave CHILDREN. Then tell me that we don’t allow this to happen, that we do everything in our power to educate these children. Ask yourself, when was the last time you had a “sex talk." I know that this is a delicate issue to talk about with children or anybody. You have the choices to prevent and educate or just continue to hand out contraceptives and tell yourselves everything will be okay.

home | news | opinion | literature | sports | entertainment
©2007 Grizzly Gazette | about us | gazette@grizzlygazette.net
Wal-Mart - Porterville Recorder - Sierra View District Hospital - Dr. Buettner
Woodard Homes - Perkos - AGR Contracting - Exchange Club of Porterville - Law Offices of Robert Krase - Zonta Club of Porterville - Porterville Breakfast Lions Club