Valentine's Day: a corporate sham?
Daniel's "rant" is on Valentine's Day. He believes that we should show our love and care every day of the year, instead of only on Valentine's Day.
Rant number two: Valentine's Day
Daniel Hensley | 2/22/08 | Opinion

Even though Valentine's Day was about a week ago, I'm still ranting. Why do we place such importance on Valentine's Day? Why do people feel the need to buy into the corporate lie that is Valentine's Day? Above all else, who truly believes that what we celebrate as Valentine's Day is anything more than a sham created by those who want to get richer off of our money?

Why do we as a society buy into this sham of an ideal? Is it love? Do we feel that this one day out of the year is nearly enough to show that one special someone that we truly care? If we really cared, we wouldn't have to celebrate Valentine's Day because we would express our love and care every single day of the year. I'm not saying that we should go out and buy over-sized teddy bears every day. That would clutter rooms and empty wallets. I'm not saying to go out and buy massive amounts of chocolates for that special someone every day. That would lead to cavities and more obesity. What I'm saying is, we should find ways to show that we care everyday, not just on that one day out of the year.

Why is it that we feel the need to show our love through material goods? Why is it a giant stuffed monstrosity? Why is it a huge box of candy? Why can't it be a kind word or gesture? Why can't it be simply asking how someone's day was or if they're doing okay at home? Our consumerist economy has blinded us to the true ideal of what could be a beautiful holiday. Our drive to show off the best present has led us away from the caring gesture originally intended to be behind the act.

Now, I'm not saying that everyone leaves love and care behind when they give gifts on Valentine's Day. I'm not saying that the only reason we have Valentine's Day is so that the major conglomerates can gain an extra penny out of our hard earned wages. What I am saying, however, is that we shouldn't go all out on one day out of the year to make up for the other 364 days that we don't do anything at all to show our affection. I'm just saying that perhaps we should move away from the consumerist holiday that it has become, and move back to the peaceful, loving holiday that it was meant to be.

No more big teddy bears (unless it's just to anger the staff) and no more huge groups of balloons tied to an even larger bundle of roses. Go for subtlety. Go for something personalized that says "I love you" not "Look, I got you the same thing that twenty other people got their significant others." Try baking. Try cooking. Try anything that shows that it is YOU that cares, not some major corporation that mass produces their "love."

Fight against the major corporations. Fight against the meaningless holiday that has become Valentine's Day. And most importantly, show the meaning of Valentine's Day every day, not just the one day out of the year.

Cheers.



Please keep in mind that this is a high school newspaper. Please make your responses professional and appropriate. Any comments deemed inappropriate will not be posted.
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:

Grizzly Weather
Gazette Podcast
NSPA
Name: Morgen
Date & Time: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 02:50 pm
Subject: Rant number two: Valentine's Day

Let people do what they want.
Honestly, if they want to get their special someone something, let them.
I know that you should show the one you 'love' affection, but on this day, buy them something
lovely. We buy millions of things everyday with money!
It's not a big deal! Quit making [a big deal out of] something as harmless
as buying your loved one a nice gift, and move on.
I don't mean to sound rude, because I don't personally
know who you are, but it's a holiday. Let people enjoy it.

Name: Marie A.
Date & Time: Monday, February 25, 2008 01:48 pm
Subject: Rant number two: Valentine's Day

I totally agree with you on this one Daniel! It used to be a special holiday, named after St. Valentine. Also, for the people who may not have a "special someone," it just makes them feel downright crappy. Especially if everyone around you is getting stuffed animals and chocolates and roses. Others just stand there, alone. I don't believe that’s fair to them. We do not need just one day out of the year to show our love and affection for others, and not just significant others, but friends and family as well. I don't need material possessions to be happy. Of course it would be nice to get a rose or something, but I'm not going to complain. As long as I know I have people who care for me, it doesn't matter. "Its the thought that counts." Roses will wilt, candies will rot or be digested, and stuffed animals can get torn up; but love and affection is what will be remembered. You can't buy love from a store; it is priceless.
So I'm glad you decided to speak up on it. Not as a "I hate V-day because I didn't have someone, or get anything" sort of thing, but that you really do believe that the corporations are ruining what's meant to be a beautiful holiday.

Name: Gabe
Date & Time: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:07 am
Subject: Rant number two: Valentine's Day

Well, maybe that would work if girls weren't so picky and expected us guys to get them things. But other than that I totally agree!
Because I would much rather show my affection with words than spend my money.

Name: Kyle R. Ferguson
Date & Time: Friday, February 22, 2008 05:02 pm
Subject: Rant number two: Valentine's Day

I agree with you Daniel. The holiday has lost its personal touch and I do think that the major corporations are trying to just pickpocket us as we look on blindly. And I have to say that I am COMPLETELY for personal gifts like baking and making things to really show care. I only have one thing to say against you though. When we bust out major bucks to pay for all of these things presented by the major conglomerates, there is a bit more emotion in it for certain people. I know that you are probably referring to people in general and not the side groups that are the exception. But when I spend my money [something that I hardly ever have] on presents, beyond the idea of the gift is the thought that I was willing to give up my money [for me personally I spent all I had] and miss out on gaining any material possessions myself. It was the fact that I was willing to give up what I had for someone else.
Now, don't get me wrong. I do completely agree with you. I'm just saying that for people who have a hard time with creativity or cooking, spending a ton of money on something nice isn't such a bad alternative.

 

home | news | opinion | literature | sports | entertainment
©2007 Grizzly Gazette | about us | gazette@grizzlygazette.net
Wal-Mart - Porterville Recorder - Sierra View District Hospital - Dr. Buettner
Woodard Homes - Perkos - AGR Contracting - Exchange Club of Porterville - Law Offices of Robert Krase - Zonta Club of Porterville - Porterville Breakfast Lions Club