Should we have to recite the Pledge of Allegiance?
Beverly Congdon is a regular editorialist for the Grizzly Gazette. Bev argues that the Pledge of Allegiance should be proudly recited by all citizens.
Pro: The Pledge of Allegiance
Beverly Congdon | 3/5/08 | Opinion
The Pledge of Allegiance is a thirty-one-word pledge that students across America should be proud to recite.  The Pledge of Allegiance not only is a show of appreciation to be living in America, but also commemorates the patriots, the fallen soldiers who died to preserve our rights and liberties, who died in defense of this free and awesome nation.

For those who refuse to cite the pledge on the grounds that they do not wish to pledge to the current president: where does it ever mention pledging to the nation’s leader? Never. You should continue to cite the pledge.

The Pledge of Allegiance is not saying that our country is perfect, but rather reminds us that as American citizens we constantly are able to strive for more.  Pledging allegiance to the flag is pledging to uphold the human liberties our country was founded on and the principles our constitution was mended to better include.  It is true that at its infancy our country was far from perfect.  But with the way the Constitution works, we are always able to change and adapt our laws in the United States. Two-hundred years since America’s birth, and the Constitution is still being mended. 

Is it just too troublesome or difficult to cite a thirty-one-word pledge before school?  Is it a violation of our liberties? Certainly not as one is free to abstain from reciting the pledge. We are not ever forced to say the Pledge of Allegiance. It is another awesome freedom we have throughout the united yet diverse states in America.

 It is true that few students actually pledge out of appreciation or respect for this nation and its patriots.  However the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools still serves as a reminder to children and teenagers today that we live in the land of the free and the home of the brave.  For the students a bit more on the patriotic side, they more fully grasp the content of the pledge.  I pity the other citizens who fail to realize how fortunate they are to live without fear of their government, to live the American life. 

Unavoidably, there will always be those who don’t appreciate this country, those that instead repeatedly bite the hand (America) that feeds them.  But does that mean we should stop citing the pledge?  Hopefully someday they will realize that there are more people across the globe that would trade places with them immediately.

The phrase “under God” is especially controversial in the pledge.  Why is it there if the U.S. is supposed to have freedom of religion and separation of church and state?

This nation was founded on principles of liberty, equality, justice. Where did we get these principles?  John Locke is considered the intellectual father of the Constitution. He believed these “natural, unalienable right” were God-given.  He used religious beliefs to support the argument that all men are created equal.

As Mr. Wilder, a Granite Hills History teacher, says in the Grizzly Gazette’s featured letter to the editor for this week, “religion played a role in shaping public opinion about morals and therefore it influenced laws” and that throughout history “religion played a role in shaping public opinion about morals and therefore it influenced laws.” 

Immigrants first migrated to this country to escape religious persecution, and still do today.  

If it weren’t for religion and religious movements in this nation, the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not exist.  If it weren’t for religious leaders, the civil rights movement, the improvement of working conditions, and other privileges we enjoy today would not exist.   Religion has shaped and defined American polices and ideologies. 

Thus, the phrase “under God,” makes perfect sense. For those who do not wish to acknowledge God’s influence on this country and for the small portion of this country that claim to be atheist, it is still possible to pledge to the American flag in a non-religious way while still showing respect to the fallen soldiers who died to preserve our liberties, while still expressing admiration for this nation. Just vocally omit the words “under God” when you recite the pledge—it’s that simple! 

All this fuss about pledging allegiance to the flag—why??? As unique individuals living peacefully in the free United States of America, we should all proudly recite the Pledge of Allegiance. 

Read the opposing editorial by clicking here!



Please keep in mind that this is a high school newspaper. Please make your responses professional and appropriate. Any comments deemed inappropriate will not be posted.
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:

Grizzly Weather
Gazette Podcast
NSPA
Name: Matt Garcia
Date & Time:
Friday, April 18, 2008 12:30 pm
Subject:
Pro: The Pledge of Allegiance

I couldn’t agree with this article more. I believe it to be disrespectful not to salute our nation's flag. The flag is a symbol for freedom and should be cherished by all Americans, especially by the students at GHHS, who many of their parents are or were illegal inhabitants of this country at one point, and were not better off in the native land. This is the land of opportunity, and [we should] at least show some gratitude by doing a simple act like a morning pledge. All people should salute the flag as a sign of respect and patriotism.

Name: Morgen Wells
Date & Time: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 02:03 pm
Subject:
Pro: The Pledge of Allegiance

I read your article and I agree with you 100%.
If you live in America, you should be proud to live here and in this free country. If people keep complaining [so much] about [saying] The Pledge of Allegiance, then why do they live here? It's a simple question. It's shameful to know that half of America does\'t want to say our own Pledge. And I also agree, as well, it never says that we are pledging to our president.
I know many people don't like our current president, but it never says we are pledging to him. So in conclusion, I really wish people, could get over it, and move on to other issues!

Name: Michael Smith
Date & Time: Wednesday 05th of March 2008 07:18:07 PM
Subject: Pro: The Pledge of Allegiance

Bev says that, "this nation was founded on principles of liberty, equality, justice." Would that be the liberty of blacks to work in horrid conditions for hours on end, with the only incentive to do it correctly being the fear of getting beat? The equality of women to basically be walking, cleaning, uteri who had to teach the kids? The argument is that this nation was founded on liberty, which of itself is a false assumption: it was founded on the idea of liberty, but if that liberty would be troublesome to obtain, then forget about it. And a note about the whole religious issue, Amy noted how it was against the Jehovah’s Witness religion, but in actuality, it is against any religion which holds the Ten Commandments in any regard. The Second Commandment states [to] forbid the making or worshiping of idols. Idols, according to Merriam-Webster, are "objects of extreme devotion." I personally do not know Bev's or Amy's religious affiliations, but I wonder if, by pledging allegiance to the flag with great devotion, they are themselves, religious hypocrites. Personally, being an atheist, I don't have to worry about the religious implications, but I still refuse to say the Pledge of Allegiance, but for a logical reason: I don't pay any allegiance to this country. Plain and simple, and anyone who feels the same should refuse to say it as well.

 

home | news | opinion | literature | sports | entertainment
©2007 Grizzly Gazette | about us | gazette@grizzlygazette.net
Wal-Mart - Porterville Recorder - Sierra View District Hospital - Dr. Buettner
Woodard Homes - Perkos - AGR Contracting - Exchange Club of Porterville - Law Offices of Robert Krase - Zonta Club of Porterville - Porterville Breakfast Lions Club